Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
MCAQMD
Regulation 1 Amendments
Grading
  • Public Workshops
  • March, 2006
2
Purpose and need
  • Dust related to construction and grading are the fourth largest source of Particulate Matter in the District.
  • The public is being negatively impacted by dust emitted in violation of existing rules
  • Goal is to replace reactive complaint driven process with proactive permit driven process.
3
Existing District Grading Regulations
  • All Grading activities (except for agriculture) are subject to District Regulation 1, Rule 430.
  • Rule 430 does not require permits, but activities must comply with it’s requirements.
  • The District frequently warns and issues citations for failure to comply with Rule 430.
4
Rule 430 Requirements
  • “The following airborne dust control measures shall be required during all construction operations, the grading of roads, or the clearing of land”


  • 1.) Soil shall be watered
  • 2.) Posted speed limit of 10 MPH or less
  • 3.) All track-out shall be removed promptly
  • 4.) Stockpiles must be treated to reduce dust
  • 5.) No activities during high winds
  • 6.) Project site secured during non-work hours
  • 7.) Operator shall keep a log of dust control measures
5
Rule 430 Enforcement
  • Typically the District is unaware of a large grading project until it begins to receive complaints and the public is already being affected. The District then contacts the operator and may issue a Notice of Violation if Rule 430 is not being followed.


  • This is a REACTIVE, not a pro-active, process. The public is negatively impacted before the problem is solved.
6
Proposed Change
  • For larger construction activities the applicant would be required to receive a permit from the District prior to starting operations.


  • No other changes are proposed and the regulatory requirements would remain the same.
7
Why a permit?
  • Currently the applicants are largely unaware of the Rule 430 requirements. A permit for large operations will serve as an opportunity for education and as a pre-project reminder that proper dust control is important.
  • The Goal is to create a PRO-ACTIVE process in which the problem is solved before the public is negatively impacted.
8
Exemptions
  • Emergency activities by governmental entities
  • Agricultural operations
  • Maintenance of existing roads
  • Construction of public roads


9
Permit Fee
  • The proposed permit fee is $100 + $50 for each additional acre, or road mile, disturbed.
  • Fees are for costs of review and a site visit by a District inspector.
  • Permits can be renewed without additional fees each year construction continues.


10
Comments
  • Comment Deadline – March 31st, 2006


  • Send Comments to
  • MCAQMD
  • 306 E. Gobbi Street
  • Ukiah, Ca 95482


  • Web www.co.mendocino.ca.us/aqmd