|
1
|
- Public Workshops
- March, 2006
|
|
2
|
- Dust related to construction and grading are the fourth largest source
of Particulate Matter in the District.
- The public is being negatively impacted by dust emitted in violation of
existing rules
- Goal is to replace reactive complaint driven process with proactive
permit driven process.
|
|
3
|
- All Grading activities (except for agriculture) are subject to District
Regulation 1, Rule 430.
- Rule 430 does not require permits, but activities must comply with it’s
requirements.
- The District frequently warns and issues citations for failure to comply
with Rule 430.
|
|
4
|
- “The following airborne dust control measures shall be required during
all construction operations, the grading of roads, or the clearing of
land”
- 1.) Soil shall be watered
- 2.) Posted speed limit of 10 MPH or less
- 3.) All track-out shall be removed promptly
- 4.) Stockpiles must be treated to reduce dust
- 5.) No activities during high winds
- 6.) Project site secured during non-work hours
- 7.) Operator shall keep a log of dust control measures
|
|
5
|
- Typically the District is unaware of a large grading project until it
begins to receive complaints and the public is already being affected.
The District then contacts the operator and may issue a Notice of
Violation if Rule 430 is not being followed.
- This is a REACTIVE, not a pro-active, process. The public is negatively
impacted before the problem is solved.
|
|
6
|
- For larger construction activities the applicant would be required to
receive a permit from the District prior to starting operations.
- No other changes are proposed and the regulatory requirements would
remain the same.
|
|
7
|
- Currently the applicants are largely unaware of the Rule 430
requirements. A permit for large operations will serve as an opportunity
for education and as a pre-project reminder that proper dust control is
important.
- The Goal is to create a PRO-ACTIVE process in which the problem is
solved before the public is negatively impacted.
|
|
8
|
- Emergency activities by governmental entities
- Agricultural operations
- Maintenance of existing roads
- Construction of public roads
|
|
9
|
- The proposed permit fee is $100 + $50 for each additional acre, or road
mile, disturbed.
- Fees are for costs of review and a site visit by a District inspector.
- Permits can be renewed without additional fees each year construction
continues.
|
|
10
|
- Comment Deadline – March 31st, 2006
- Send Comments to
- MCAQMD
- 306 E. Gobbi Street
- Ukiah, Ca 95482
- Web www.co.mendocino.ca.us/aqmd
|